◎欢迎参与讨论,请在这里发表您的看法、交流您的观点。
“We believe a democratic vision for AI is essential to unlocking its full potential and ensuring its benefits are broadly shared,” OpenAI wrote, echoing similar language in the White House memo上海花千坊. “We believe democracies should continue to take the lead in AI development, guided by values like freedom, fairness, and respect for human rights.”上海419论坛
It offered a number of ways OpenAI could help pursue that goal, including efforts to “streamline translation and summarization tasks, and study and mitigate civilian harm,” while still prohibiting its technology from being used to “harm people, destroy property, or develop weapons.” Above all, it was a message from OpenAI that it is on board with national security work.爱上海同城对对碰
The new policies emphasize “flexibility and compliance with the law,” says Heidy Khlaaf, a chief AI scientist at the AI Now Institute and a safety researcher who authored a paper with OpenAI in 2022 about the possible hazards of its technology in contexts including the military. The company’s pivot “ultimately signals an acceptability in carrying out activities related to military and warfare as the Pentagon and US military see fit,” she says.上海娱乐网
Amazon, Google, and OpenAI’s partner and investor Microsoft have competed for the Pentagon’s cloud computing contracts for years. Those companies have learned that working with defense can be incredibly lucrative, and OpenAI’s pivot, which comes as the company expects $5 billion in losses and is reportedly exploring new revenue streams like advertising, could signal that it wants a piece of those contracts. Big Tech’s relationships with the military also no longer elicit the outrage and scrutiny that they once did上海品茶工作室. But OpenAI is not a cloud provider, and the technology it’s building stands to do much more than simply store and retrieve data. With this new partnership, OpenAI promises to help sort through data on the battlefield, provide insights about threats, and help make the decision-making process in war faster and more efficient.
OpenAI’s statements on national security perhaps raise more questions than they answer. The company wants to mitigate civilian harm, but for which civilians? Does contributing AI models to a program that takes down drones not count as developing weapons that could harm people爱上海419?上海花千坊
“Defensive weapons are still indeed weapons,” Khlaaf says上海各区新茶工作室. They “can often be positioned offensively subject to the locale and aim of a mission.”
本文地址: https://qinangsgcglz.com/shxczy/18.html
文章来源:Admin888
版权声明:除非特别标注,否则均为本站原创文章,转载时请以链接形式注明文章出处。
◎欢迎参与讨论,请在这里发表您的看法、交流您的观点。